Study Guide

FINRA Series 7 Study Guide

Learn to evaluate securities, make customer recommendations, handle accounts and carry out transactions as a general securities representative.

Updated October 202663 min readStudy GuideTreasury Conquer
Jonathan Scott

Jonathan Scott

Treasury Conquer Editorial Team

A Series 7 representative has to connect product knowledge with a customer’s circumstances and the mechanics of a transaction. A bond’s quoted yield matters only after you understand its price, call provisions, credit risk and tax treatment. An option’s payoff matters alongside the customer’s ability to bear its loss. This guide follows the work from seeking business and opening accounts through analyzing investments, making recommendations and completing trades. Each concept has a concrete calculation or decision to work through. Pay particular attention to what changes a conclusion: a shorter time horizon, a concentrated portfolio, an embedded option or an instruction that differs from what the customer authorized. Those details often determine the appropriate action.

Function 1: Seeks Business for the Broker-Dealer from Customers and Potential Customers

1. Classify customer communications

Classify a communication by who receives it and how widely it is distributed during a 30-day period. A written or electronic message to no more than 25 retail investors is correspondence; one distributed or made available to more than 25 is a retail communication. An institutional communication is directed only to institutional investors. A person does not become institutional merely because they are wealthy or experienced. Classification determines the applicable supervisory review, approval and recordkeeping path. Retail communications generally require approval by an appropriately qualified registered principal before use, subject to rule-specific exceptions. Correspondence also needs supervision, but its review process differs. Check the actual audience and distribution plan before sending a message, including copies forwarded through a campaign. The Series 7 content outline identifies these communication types and approvals as representative knowledge.

Worked example: A representative plans to email the same product description to 40 individual prospects within 30 days. Because 40 exceeds 25 retail investors, the email is a retail communication, even if each prospect receives a separate copy. The representative should submit it for the applicable principal review before use and preserve the required record. Calling it personal correspondence would not change its distribution.

Watch the distinction: A personalized greeting does not make a mass email correspondence. Count retail recipients over the relevant period, then apply the review requirements for that communication category.

Reference: [1]

2. Check promotional claims

A fair sales message lets a customer distinguish the investment's possible return from a contract's specific protection. For a variable annuity, separate-account investments fluctuate, while an insurer may promise a defined death or living benefit under stated conditions. A benefit guarantee can depend on holding periods, withdrawal limits, insurer claims-paying ability and rider charges. It does not automatically protect every contribution or promise a fixed investment return. Test each promotional claim by asking what exactly is guaranteed, who provides the promise, when it applies and what costs or restrictions accompany it. Present material risks and costs close enough to the benefit claim to prevent a misleading overall impression. Charts, testimonials and seminar slides require the same care as spoken explanations. Product disclosures support the explanation, but an inaccurate headline is not cured merely by handing out a prospectus.

Worked example: A seminar slide says, "Your variable annuity investment return is guaranteed." The contract instead guarantees a specified insurance benefit if its conditions are met. Replace the claim with: "The separate-account value rises or falls with its investments. An optional insurer benefit may provide the stated protection under its terms and charges." Review those terms before describing a customer's likely outcome.

Watch the distinction: Do not treat a guaranteed withdrawal or death benefit as a guaranteed account balance. The contract may protect a defined payment while its investment value falls.

Reference: [1]

3. Follow a registered offering

A registered public offering moves through filing, a waiting period, effectiveness and sales. Before filing, offers are generally restricted. After the registration statement is filed but before it becomes effective, permitted preliminary prospectuses and other permitted communications can help investors evaluate the issue. The preliminary prospectus may omit final price and underwriting details; it is not an authorization to complete a sale. Representatives may discuss the offering within the applicable limits and collect nonbinding indications of interest, but they cannot accept a binding purchase or deliver the securities before effectiveness. Once effective, the offering can be sold under its final terms, and the required final prospectus must be provided in the applicable manner. Check the filing's status, the material being used and whether the customer is merely expressing interest or making a purchase commitment.

Worked example: An issuer has filed its registration statement, and a prospect asks to buy 200 shares immediately. The representative can discuss permitted preliminary information and record a nonbinding indication of interest. Because the registration statement is not effective, the representative cannot complete the 200-share sale. After effectiveness, the customer can decide whether to purchase on the final offering terms.

Watch the distinction: Filing begins a permitted pre-sale information period; it does not make the securities immediately saleable. A preliminary prospectus cannot replace effectiveness or final offering terms.

Reference: [1]

4. Compare distribution routes

In a firm-commitment offering, underwriters buy securities from the issuer and take the risk of distributing them to investors. Syndicate members share that underwriting commitment under their agreement. The difference between the public offering price and the amount paid to the issuer is the underwriting spread, which can include several compensation components; it is not automatically one firm's profit. A selling group helps place securities and receives a concession, but ordinarily does not buy the issue from the issuer or assume the syndicate's unsold-inventory commitment. In a best-efforts arrangement, the dealer instead seeks buyers without guaranteeing that the issuer will receive proceeds for an entire issue. An exempt private offering follows a different registration route, often with limits on eligible purchasers, solicitation or resale. Identify the contractual commitment first, then the selling role and applicable offering conditions.

Worked example: A syndicate pays an issuer $19.20 per share and offers the shares at $20.00. The spread is $20.00 minus $19.20, or $0.80 per share; on 10,000 shares it totals $8,000 before allocation and expenses. A selling group member may earn part of that spread as a concession, but its placement role does not itself create the syndicate's purchase commitment.

Watch the distinction: A concession is compensation for selling, not proof that the dealer underwrote the issue. Read the underwriting and selling agreements to identify who bears unsold-inventory risk.

Reference: [1]

Function 2: Opens Accounts After Obtaining and Evaluating Customers’ Financial Profile and Investment Objectives

5. Choose account ownership

Account registration determines who owns the property, who may act and what happens at death. An individual account belongs to one owner. Joint registrations require attention to each owner's share and the presence or absence of survivorship rights. Under tenancy in common, an owner's fractional interest ordinarily passes through that person's estate rather than automatically to the other owner. Entity accounts belong to the entity, so representatives need evidence of its existence and who is authorized to act for it. In a trust account, the trustee acts under the trust instrument for the beneficiaries; the beneficiary is not automatically an authorized trader. Match the requested outcome to the registration, then examine the documents that establish authority. Ownership, trading authority and beneficial interest answer different questions. State property law and account documentation can affect the precise result.

Worked example: Two siblings want each half of their joint account to pass under their own estate plans. A tenancy-in-common registration matches that intent: each owns a one-half interest, assuming the documents specify equal shares. If one dies, that sibling's half becomes part of their estate; the surviving sibling keeps their own half. A survivorship registration would produce a different ownership result.

Watch the distinction: Joint ownership does not always mean the survivor receives everything. The registration's survivorship terms determine whether a deceased owner's share passes directly or through an estate.

Reference: [1]

6. Compare retirement accounts

Retirement accounts differ in who contributes, when contributions may be deductible, how earnings are taxed and how distributions are treated. A traditional account may contain pretax and after-tax amounts; a Roth account follows a different tax path. Employer plans can also hold distinct contribution sources, including employee deferrals and employer contributions. Before moving assets, identify the sending plan, the tax character of each amount and whether the receiving plan accepts it. A direct rollover sends eligible assets between custodians or plans without paying the customer personally. An indirect rollover begins with a distribution to the customer and introduces withholding and timing issues under applicable rules. Neither route turns pretax money into Roth money without possible tax consequences. Registration and investment choices still matter after the move. The separate SIE study guide can help reinforce the account and tax vocabulary.

Worked example: A customer directs an eligible employer plan to send pretax assets straight to a traditional IRA custodian. That is a direct rollover: the customer does not receive the funds, and their pretax character generally continues. If the customer instead takes payment personally, withholding and rollover timing become relevant. Sending pretax money to a Roth account may create taxable conversion income, so the receiving account must be checked.

Watch the distinction: A rollover is not automatically tax-free because both accounts have retirement labels. Trace the source amount and receiving account's tax character before describing the result.

Reference: [1]

7. Identify the customer

Customer identification establishes who is opening an account; know-your-customer work establishes the essential facts needed to service that account. For a person, compare identifying information with reliable documents or other permitted verification methods. For an entity, establish its legal identity and who owns or controls it under the applicable procedures. A mismatch is a question to resolve, not a detail to overwrite. Ask for a coherent explanation and supporting records, document the discrepancy and escalate it through the firm's compliance process when appropriate. Suspicious activity can involve unexplained control, unusual funding, inconsistent business purpose or attempts to avoid identification. Representatives should avoid promising secrecy or deciding alone that a concern is harmless. The practical sequence is to identify, verify, understand authority and purpose, then obtain the required account approval before activity proceeds.

Worked example: An applicant's stated address conflicts with their identification, and they cannot explain who controls a newly formed company. The representative should clarify the individual's address, verify the entity and its authorized controllers, and record the answers. Until those identity and ownership questions are resolved through the required review, the firm should not treat the application as ready for trading.

Watch the distinction: An entity's formation papers do not by themselves identify its controlling people or authorize every applicant to trade. Resolve both the entity's identity and the person's authority.

Reference: [1]

8. Verify account authority

An account owner holds the property, while an authorized agent may act only within the authority granted. A power of attorney can permit an agent to give specific trading instructions without making the representative discretionary. Discretion exists when the representative chooses an element such as the security or the amount without the customer's contemporaneous direction; the applicable rules recognize narrow exceptions for time and price instructions. Before accepting an agent's order, verify the document, the account it covers, any limits and whether it remains effective. If the representative is to exercise discretion, obtain the required written customer authorization, firm acceptance and supervisory approval before doing so. Record who actually made each decision. A representative's belief that an investment is suitable cannot substitute for the needed authority. Authority is therefore checked separately from investment merit.

Worked example: A customer's adult child has a valid power of attorney allowing the child to place trades. The child may instruct an authorized purchase, subject to the document and account controls. If the child says, "You choose a fund and amount," the representative would be exercising discretion. The child's trading authority alone does not grant that power; separate discretionary authorization and firm approval are required.

Watch the distinction: Do not transfer an agent's decision-making authority to the representative by implication. A valid power of attorney permits the agent's actions within its terms, not unauthorized representative discretion.

Reference: [1]

9. Build the investment profile

An investment objective describes a desired result, while the investment profile shows whether the customer can bear the route to that result. Gather assets, liabilities, income, tax position, existing holdings, experience, time horizon and expected withdrawals. Separate money needed soon from capital available for longer-term fluctuation. Risk tolerance describes willingness to experience loss; risk capacity describes the financial ability to absorb it without disrupting essential plans. A customer may be enthusiastic about aggressive growth yet have little capacity to risk funds needed for a fixed payment. Evaluate liquidity and concentration before choosing products or account features. Revisit the profile when a major life or financial change occurs. The goal is to connect each proposed investment's possible losses, costs and access restrictions to the actual use of the money.

Worked example: A customer has $80,000 in investable assets and needs $30,000 for a home purchase next year. That $30,000 represents 37.5% of the assets and has a short, fixed horizon. The remaining $50,000 may be evaluated for longer-term growth after considering other needs. The customer's aggressive-growth preference alone does not justify exposing the home funds to a substantial market decline.

Watch the distinction: A stated appetite for risk does not erase a known cash need. Separate the required payment from long-term capital before evaluating volatile or hard-to-sell investments.

Reference: [1]

Function 3: Provides Customers with Information About Investments, Makes Recommendations, Transfers Assets and Maintains Appropriate Records

10. Measure portfolio concentration

Concentration measures how much of a portfolio depends on one issuer, sector or economic driver. Divide the exposure's current market value by total portfolio market value, using values from the same date. For a proposed purchase funded by new cash, add the purchase to both the position and total portfolio. If it is funded by selling another holding, total value may stay roughly unchanged before market changes and transaction costs. Look through funds where possible: a sector fund can add to an existing single-stock exposure. Concentration increases the effect of issuer-specific news, even if the security has performed well. Assess the proposed allocation alongside the customer's horizon, liquidity needs and other correlated holdings. Diversification can reduce company-specific risk but does not eliminate broad market losses. Recalculate after a purchase rather than relying on the position's old percentage.

Worked example: A $200,000 portfolio contains $70,000 of one company's stock, so its starting weight is 70,000/200,000 = 35%. The customer adds $20,000 of new cash to that stock. The position becomes $90,000 in a $220,000 portfolio, or 90,000/220,000 = 40.91%. More than two-fifths of the portfolio now depends on that company, increasing single-issuer risk.

Watch the distinction: Do not divide the new $90,000 position by the old $200,000 total when fresh cash funds the purchase. Update both numerator and denominator.

Reference: [1]

11. Use beta and alpha

Beta estimates a security's sensitivity to broad market movements, based on a particular measurement period and benchmark. In the capital asset pricing model, expected return equals the assumed risk-free rate plus beta times the assumed market risk premium. This gives a benchmark return for systematic risk, not a forecast guaranteed to occur. Alpha compares actual return with that model benchmark over the same period; positive alpha means the observed return exceeded the benchmark under the stated assumptions. Check whether returns use the same dates, currency and treatment of dividends before comparing them. Beta does not capture every risk, especially company-specific events, and an estimate can change over time. A single positive alpha observation is weak evidence of enduring skill. Use the calculation to interpret risk and performance, then consider the model's assumptions and the customer's broader portfolio.

Worked example: Assume a 3% risk-free rate, a 5% market risk premium and beta of 1.2. CAPM expected return is 3% + (1.2 × 5%) = 9%. If the investment actually returns 11% over that same period, measured alpha is 11% minus 9%, or 2 percentage points. This is a past model-relative result, not an assured future excess return.

Watch the distinction: Beta of 1.2 does not mean a promised 20% gain. It describes estimated market sensitivity, while alpha depends on an actual return and a comparable benchmark.

Reference: [1]

12. Read the financial statements

The income statement reports revenue and expenses over a period; the balance sheet shows assets, liabilities and equity at a date. The cash flow statement reconciles how cash changed through operating, investing and financing activities. These statements answer different questions because accrual accounting can record revenue before cash is collected. Rising receivables may explain why earnings grow faster than operating cash flow, but they may also reflect ordinary sales timing. Compare receivables with sales, examine aging and collection trends, and read footnotes for revenue recognition, credit risks, accounting choices and unusual transactions. Also consider whether inventory, payables or one-time items explain the gap. Strong reported profit is more persuasive when cash conversion is consistent and the accounting policies are understandable. A single period's cash shortfall is a diagnostic cue, not proof that reported earnings are false.

Worked example: A company reports $12 million in net income but only $3 million in operating cash flow, a $9 million gap. Receivables have risen sharply, suggesting some recognized sales have not yet produced cash. The representative should compare receivable growth with sales, inspect collection and credit-loss disclosures, and review revenue-recognition footnotes before concluding that the earnings are well supported.

Watch the distinction: Net income is not cash collected. Accruals can create a legitimate gap, so investigate its sources before either accepting the profit figure uncritically or alleging misstatement.

Reference: [1]

13. Test liquidity and leverage

Liquidity ratios test resources available for near-term obligations; leverage ratios test reliance on borrowing. The current ratio divides current assets by current liabilities. The quick ratio narrows the numerator to assets expected to turn into cash readily, generally excluding inventory and prepayments. State what is included when the available data are simplified. Working capital is current assets minus current liabilities, expressed in currency rather than a ratio. Debt-to-equity divides debt by shareholders' equity, showing the scale of borrowing relative to the owners' accounting stake. A large inventory balance can make the current ratio look stronger than the quick ratio, especially if stock is slow to sell. No ratio alone proves safety: check debt maturities, cash flow, inventory quality and the industry. Compare consistent definitions across periods and companies.

Worked example: Assume current assets are $120 million, including $50 million of inventory and no prepayments, with $60 million of current liabilities. Current ratio is 120/60 = 2.0; quick ratio is (120 − 50)/60 = 1.17. Working capital is $60 million. With $90 million of debt and $90 million of equity, debt-to-equity is 1.0. Inventory explains the liquidity gap.

Watch the distinction: A 2.0 current ratio does not mean all assets are immediately spendable. Inventory may require time or discounts to convert into cash for obligations.

Reference: [1]

14. Interpret earnings ratios

Earnings per share divides earnings available to common shareholders by the relevant weighted-average common shares, with a diluted version reflecting potential additional shares. Price-to-earnings divides the market price per share by EPS, expressing how much investors pay for a dollar of reported earnings. Dividend payout divides dividends per share by EPS; dividend yield divides annual dividends per share by market price. Payout indicates how much of earnings is distributed, while yield describes cash income relative to today's price. A low P/E can signal a bargain, weak expected growth or unusually high temporary earnings. A high payout may constrain reinvestment or become difficult if cash flow weakens. Compare earnings quality, debt, growth prospects, industry peers and the customer's income needs. Use the same period and share basis when combining figures.

Worked example: Assume a stock trades at $40, has $2 of annual EPS and pays $0.80 in annual dividends per share. P/E is 40/2 = 20. Payout is 0.80/2 = 40%, and dividend yield is 0.80/40 = 2%. These describe price and income relationships; without growth, cash flow and risk context, they do not show whether $40 is cheap.

Watch the distinction: A low P/E is not automatically attractive, and a high dividend yield is not automatically secure. Price can fall because investors expect weaker earnings or dividends.

Reference: [1]

15. Track the share count

Authorized shares are the maximum number a corporation's governing documents permit it to issue, subject to changes through the required corporate process. Issued shares have been distributed by the company at some point. Outstanding shares are issued shares still held outside the company. Treasury shares are previously issued shares the company has repurchased and holds; therefore, outstanding equals issued minus treasury shares. Treasury shares generally do not vote or receive dividends while held by the issuer. A repurchase can reduce outstanding shares and mechanically raise earnings per share if earnings are otherwise unchanged, but the cash spent and any debt used matter to valuation. An authorization to issue shares does not mean they are already owned by investors. When comparing per-share measures, check whether the share count refers to a date or a weighted average over the reporting period.

Worked example: A company has 10 million authorized shares and has issued 6 million. It repurchases 1 million issued shares, leaving 5 million outstanding and 1 million in treasury. The unissued portion is 4 million shares. Only the 5 million outstanding shares carry ordinary shareholder voting and dividend rights; the treasury shares remain issued but are held by the company.

Watch the distinction: Do not subtract treasury shares from authorized shares to find outstanding shares. Authorized capacity and actual issuance are separate; first find issued shares, then subtract treasury shares.

Reference: [1]

16. Apply common-stock rights

Common stock carries a residual claim: common shareholders receive value after creditors and senior equity claims in a liquidation. They typically vote on directors and major corporate matters, although share classes and governing documents can vary. Under statutory voting, votes are applied separately to each seat; cumulative voting, when available, lets a shareholder concentrate votes in a director election and can help a minority holder gain representation. A preemptive right, if granted, lets existing holders buy a proportional share of a new issue to protect their ownership percentage. It does not mean the shares are free or that every new issuance triggers the right. Work from the investor's percentage before the issue, then multiply that percentage by new shares offered to find the amount needed to preserve it. Consider exercise cost as well as dilution.

Worked example: An investor owns 1,000 of 10,000 outstanding shares, or 10%. The company issues 2,000 more shares. If a qualifying preemptive right is available, buying 10% × 2,000 = 200 shares leaves the investor with 1,200/12,000 = 10%. Buying none leaves 1,000/12,000 = 8.33%, reducing their ownership and voting percentage.

Watch the distinction: A preemptive right protects a percentage only if it exists and the holder exercises it. Owning common stock does not make every later issuance nondilutive.

Reference: [1]

17. Read preferred-stock terms

Preferred shares usually have a stated dividend preference and priority over common stock for dividends and liquidation proceeds, but their precise rights come from the issue's terms. Cumulative preferred accumulates unpaid dividends; those arrears must be satisfied before common dividends can be paid. Noncumulative preferred generally does not carry missed dividends into later years. Convertible preferred may be exchanged for a specified number of common shares, adding equity upside. Callable preferred lets the issuer redeem under stated terms, exposing holders to reinvestment risk if the security is called when replacement yields are lower. Participating preferred may receive additional distributions beyond its stated preference when specified conditions are met. Distinguish the dividend promise from a debt obligation: preferred dividends are generally subject to declaration. Evaluate price, yield, seniority, conversion value and call terms together.

Worked example: A cumulative preferred share has a $6 annual dividend. Two annual dividends were missed, creating $6 × 2 = $12 of arrears per share. If a $6 current preferred dividend is also due, the preferred claim totals $18 per share before a common dividend can be paid. The calculation describes priority; it does not guarantee the issuer has cash to pay.

Watch the distinction: Missed dividends on cumulative preferred are not the same as missed bond interest. They create dividend arrears with priority over common dividends, subject to the security's terms.

Reference: [1]

18. Value rights and warrants

A stock right gives an existing holder an opportunity to buy newly issued shares under stated subscription terms, commonly for a limited exercise period. A warrant also permits purchase at a specified exercise price but often lasts longer and may be issued with another security. Read the ratio carefully: a requirement of five rights per new share means 25 rights buy five shares, not 25. Multiply the number of new shares by the subscription price to find exercise cash. Compare the subscription price with the stock's market price, but do not treat that difference as risk-free profit. Rights can have market value, and issuance may alter the stock price. An investor who buys rights must include their cost; a holder who sells or lets them expire faces a different outcome. Check expiration, transferability and whether exercise changes ownership percentage.

Worked example: Five rights permit purchase of one share at $40. A holder with 25 rights can buy 25/5 = 5 shares and must pay 5 × $40 = $200. If the stock is quoted at $48, the five shares have a quoted value of $240, a $40 difference before the rights' value, fees and any price change associated with the issue.

Watch the distinction: Do not call the $40 market-price difference a certain $40 profit. Exercising consumes rights that may have value, and the stock price can change.

Reference: [1]

19. Assess foreign share exposure

An American depositary receipt represents an interest in foreign shares held through a depositary arrangement and can let a U.S. investor trade a foreign company's equity in dollars. Dollar trading does not remove exposure to the foreign share price or its currency. A local-currency stock return and an exchange-rate return combine multiplicatively: dollar ending value equals beginning value times the share-price factor times the currency-value factor, adjusted for the receipt's share ratio where relevant. The investor also faces home-market regulation, political and accounting risks, possible depositary fees, and tax treatment of distributions. Check whether a quoted ADR represents one local share, a fraction or several shares before translating prices. Currency gains can amplify a local stock gain; currency losses can offset it. Compare returns in the same currency before judging performance.

Worked example: Assume an ADR tracks one local share, with no fees or dividends. The foreign share rises 10%, so its price factor is 1.10. The currency weakens 8% against the dollar, giving a currency factor of 0.92. Dollar return is (1.10 × 0.92) − 1 = 0.012, or 1.2%. The currency loss nearly offsets the local gain.

Watch the distinction: An ADR quoted in dollars is still exposed to exchange-rate changes. A 10% local share gain cannot be reported as a 10% dollar gain without translating currencies.

Reference: [1]

20. Track equity cost basis

Realized gain or loss on a stock sale starts with amount realized minus the adjusted basis of the shares sold. Purchase price and applicable acquisition costs contribute to basis; sale proceeds reflect the transaction's selling costs. When shares were bought in different lots, a valid specific-share identification determines which lot is sold. Without effective identification, the applicable default method may select different shares, so records matter. A stock split is different from a sale: it changes the number of shares and allocates the existing total basis across them, generally without itself realizing a gain or loss. For example, a two-for-one split doubles shares and halves basis per share if total basis is unchanged. Holding period and adjustments can affect tax reporting. Keep purchase, corporate-action and sale records aligned rather than relying on today's market value to reconstruct basis. Work more lot-selection cases in Series 7 practice questions.

Worked example: A customer bought 100 shares at $30 and another 100 at $50. They validly identify the $50 lot when selling 100 shares at $45. Ignoring transaction costs, proceeds are 100 × $45 = $4,500; basis is 100 × $50 = $5,000, so realized loss is $500. Selling the $30 lot instead would produce a $1,500 gain.

Watch the distinction: Do not average the two purchase prices after a specifically identified sale. The sold lot's own adjusted basis controls; a split reallocates basis without selecting a sale lot.

Reference: [1]

21. Relate bond price and coupon

A bond’s face value is the principal amount used to calculate its stated coupon and, ordinarily, the amount repaid at maturity. The coupon rate is fixed by the bond’s terms; its annual dollar payment does not change when investors trade the bond at a new price. Market price responds to prevailing interest rates, credit risk, and the value of remaining payments. If comparable new bonds offer higher yields, an existing fixed coupon becomes less attractive, so its price generally falls. If comparable yields fall, its price generally rises. Current yield divides annual coupon dollars by today’s price. It captures income relative to purchase price but omits the gain or loss from repayment at maturity. When reading a quote, identify which figure is face value, which is cash paid annually, and which is the price the customer would pay.

Worked example: A bond has $1,000 face value and a 5% annual coupon, so it pays $1,000 × 0.05 = $50 per year. At a $950 market price, current yield is $50 ÷ $950 = 0.05263, or about 5.26%. The stated coupon remains 5% because the $50 payment is still calculated from face value. The discount may also affect the buyer’s return if the bond is repaid at $1,000.

Watch the distinction: A price decline does not raise the bond’s coupon rate. It raises the coupon income as a percentage of the lower purchase price; maturity proceeds also matter to total yield.

Reference: [2]

22. Compare bond yields

Bond yields answer different questions. Coupon rate relates annual interest to face value; current yield relates it to market price. Yield to maturity estimates the return from buying at that price and receiving scheduled payments through maturity, assuming the stated calculation’s reinvestment convention and promised payments occur. A discount adds a gain as price moves toward par at repayment; a premium creates a loss toward par. Yield to call substitutes the call date and call price for maturity when an issuer can redeem early. For a premium callable bond, a call can accelerate loss of the premium and leave the investor reinvesting sooner. Compare yields using the same cash-flow assumptions and distinguish an approximation from an exact yield calculated by discounting each payment. Credit events and a sale before redemption can change the realized return.

Worked example: Assume a bond pays $60 annually, costs $950, and repays $1,000 in three years without a call. Current yield is $60 ÷ $950 = 6.32%. An approximate yield to maturity is [$60 + ($1,000 − $950) ÷ 3] ÷ [($1,000 + $950) ÷ 2] = $76.67 ÷ $975 = 7.86%. It exceeds current yield because repayment adds a $50 gain; exact yield requires discounting the timed cash flows.

Watch the distinction: Current yield is not the investor’s full return through redemption. It ignores the difference between purchase price and repayment value, which can materially change yield to maturity or call.

Reference: [2]

23. Gauge interest-rate sensitivity

Duration summarizes how strongly a bond’s price responds to a small yield change. Modified duration gives an approximate percentage price change for a one-percentage-point yield move: percentage price change is roughly negative modified duration times the yield change expressed as a decimal. The negative sign reflects the usual inverse price-yield relationship. Longer maturities and lower coupons generally increase sensitivity because more value arrives later. The estimate is local: larger yield moves call for a convexity adjustment, and changing credit spreads can move price even if a benchmark rate stays fixed. Embedded options make the cash-flow schedule uncertain. As rates fall, an issuer may call a bond, limiting price gains; as rates rise, calls become less likely and expected life can lengthen. Check whether a quoted duration accounts for those possible changes.

Worked example: Suppose a $1,000 bond has modified duration 6 and its relevant yield rises from 4% to 5%. The change is 0.01, so estimated price change is −6 × 0.01 = −6%. Estimated price becomes $1,000 × 0.94 = $940. This is an approximation before convexity and credit effects. If the bond is callable, a changing call probability can make its actual price response differ.

Watch the distinction: Duration is not a promise that every one-point yield move produces the same price change. It is an estimate around a starting yield, and embedded options can alter expected cash flows.

Reference: [2]

24. Evaluate embedded bond options

Embedded options shift value between issuer and investor. A call lets the issuer redeem under specified terms, often when refinancing becomes attractive. That limits the investor’s price upside and creates reinvestment risk, so compare a callable bond’s yield to call as well as its yield to maturity. A conversion feature lets the holder exchange the bond for a stated number of shares. Conversion value equals the current share price times that ratio. The holder compares conversion value with the bond’s market value, income, credit quality, and remaining option value; a conversion need not be attractive immediately for the option to have value. A convertible can therefore trade above its value as an ordinary bond. Identify who controls each option, the exercise terms, and the cash flows surrendered before judging a higher quoted yield.

Worked example: A $1,000-face convertible can become 20 common shares. At $55 per share, conversion value is 20 × $55 = $1,100. At $40, it is 20 × $40 = $800. If the bond trades at $1,050 while the stock is $40, immediate conversion would sacrifice $250 of market value. The price can still reflect interest payments, repayment prospects, and possible future stock gains.

Watch the distinction: A conversion value below the bond price does not make the convertible worthless. The holder may retain bond payments and the chance to convert later if share value rises.

Reference: [2]

25. Identify municipal security backing

Start municipal credit analysis by locating the legally pledged payment source. A general obligation bond generally relies on an issuer’s taxing power, subject to the particular issue’s legal terms and the issuer’s fiscal capacity. A revenue bond relies primarily on revenues from a specified project or enterprise, such as water charges or tolls. For a revenue issue, examine demand, rates or fees, operating costs, debt service coverage, reserves, and any additional bonds that may share pledged revenue. For a general obligation issue, examine the tax base, budget, debt burden, and the precise pledge. A familiar city name alone does not make every city-related bond a general obligation. A Series 7 representative discussing customer purchases should connect the security pledge to the risk the customer bears. FINRA’s Series 7 page describes the qualification’s municipal sales scope.

Worked example: A city issues one bond backed by its taxing power and another payable from a water system’s revenue. Water use drops while the city’s tax base remains stable. The revenue bond needs closer review of water charges, expenses, and cash available for debt service because its pledged cash flow may weaken. The general obligation bond depends on its separate tax pledge and fiscal condition; neither label guarantees payment.

Watch the distinction: Do not treat every municipal bond from the same area as having the same backing. Read the pledge: an enterprise’s revenue may support one issue while taxing power supports another.

Reference: [2]

26. Compare taxable and tax-exempt yields

A tax-equivalent yield puts a federally tax-exempt yield and a taxable yield on a comparable federal after-tax basis. If the tax-exempt bond’s income is exempt for this investor and the taxable bond’s interest faces marginal rate t, divide the exempt yield by 1 − t. The result is the taxable yield that would leave the same income after that assumed federal tax. Apply the investor’s actual tax treatment: state or local tax, alternative tax consequences, and ownership through a tax-advantaged account can change the comparison. The arithmetic also says nothing about credit quality, maturity, calls, liquidity, or price volatility. Compare securities with similar risks and cash-flow timing before choosing the higher yield. For practice, vary the assumed rate and see how the comparison changes in Series 7 practice questions.

Worked example: Assume a federally tax-exempt bond yields 4.00% and this investor’s hypothetical federal marginal rate is 32%. Tax-equivalent yield is 4.00% ÷ (1 − 0.32) = 4.00% ÷ 0.68 = 5.88%. A taxable bond yielding 5.5% would produce 5.5% × 0.68 = 3.74% after the assumed federal tax. The exempt bond leads on that measure, provided its exemption applies; state tax and bond risks still need comparison.

Watch the distinction: A tax-equivalent yield is not the bond’s actual stated yield. It is a comparison figure based on a particular investor’s assumed tax rate and treatment.

Reference: [2]

27. Read municipal offering information

A municipal official statement describes the securities, issuer, pledged security, repayment arrangements, and material risks. For a revenue issue, connect projected customer use or project revenue to operating expenses and scheduled debt service. Look for coverage history and forecasts, reserves, rate-setting authority, construction or demand risk, and covenants that constrain additional borrowing. For a general obligation issue, the tax pledge and issuer finances take greater prominence. A preliminary official statement can support substantive credit review even if final price, yield, or other offering terms are absent. Once final terms are available, confirm them and reassess whether expected return compensates for the risks at the actual price. Read projections as assumptions, not guarantees, and distinguish a security’s payment source from a broad description of the municipality.

Worked example: A preliminary official statement for a toll-road revenue bond reports projected toll receipts of $30 million and projected annual debt service of $20 million, before final pricing. Hypothetical projected coverage is $30 million ÷ $20 million = 1.5 times, but traffic and costs could differ. The representative can examine those assumptions now. The final offering price and yield must be checked later to judge the customer’s actual return.

Watch the distinction: Missing final yield does not make a preliminary official statement useless. It permits review of the pledged revenue and risks, while the final price is still needed for an investment decision.

Reference: [1]; [2]

28. Compare government-related debt

Government-related debt should be classified by the legal obligor and the specific payment guarantee. A U.S. Treasury obligation is a direct federal government obligation. Agency and government-sponsored enterprise securities may have different structures and credit support; a government-related name does not, by itself, make a bond a Treasury obligation. Read the security’s description for its issuer, any explicit federal guarantee, collateral, and whether the guarantee covers principal and interest. Then compare yield with maturity, call features, liquidity, and tax treatment held in view. A higher yield may reflect a different guarantee, different timing, or different marketability. This classification also matters when a customer asks for principal safety: explain the claim the investor actually owns rather than translating a familiar issuer label into a broader promise.

Worked example: A customer compares a Treasury note yielding a hypothetical 4.0% with a government-sponsored enterprise bond yielding 4.3%. The 0.3-percentage-point difference is 30 basis points. Before calling the bonds equivalent, identify each issuer and read the enterprise bond’s guarantee language, maturity, and call terms. If it lacks the same direct federal obligation, the extra yield cannot be interpreted as a free increase in return.

Watch the distinction: An agency or enterprise label is not proof of an identical Treasury guarantee. Check the legal obligation and any express backing before treating two government-related yields as interchangeable.

Reference: [2]

29. Explain mortgage cash flows

Mortgage-backed securities pass through cash flows generated by pools of loans, including scheduled interest, scheduled principal, and unscheduled principal prepayments. Borrowers often refinance when rates fall, returning principal sooner than expected. The investor may then have to reinvest at lower rates, and a premium paid for the security may be recovered over fewer interest payments. When rates rise, refinancing may slow, extending the investment’s expected life just when its older coupon is less attractive. Collateralized mortgage obligations, or CMOs, divide mortgage cash flows among tranches with different rules for principal and interest. A sequential-pay structure, for example, directs principal to one tranche before later tranches. Tranching redistributes timing risk; it does not remove risk from the underlying mortgages. Review expected average life under multiple prepayment assumptions.

Worked example: An investor expects a mortgage security to return principal over 20 years, but falling rates prompt many borrowers to refinance in year five. The returned principal stops earning the old coupon and must be reinvested at then-current rates. In a sequential CMO, the first tranche receives principal before the next, so the same refinancing wave can shorten the first tranche’s life while affecting later tranches differently.

Watch the distinction: A stated final maturity is not a reliable forecast of when mortgage principal arrives. Borrower prepayments change cash-flow timing, and a CMO tranche’s priority changes its exposure to that timing.

Reference: [2]

30. Price an open-end fund

An open-end fund calculates net asset value per share by subtracting liabilities from assets and dividing by shares outstanding. Purchases and redemptions are priced using the next NAV calculated after the fund receives an order in proper form, subject to any applicable sales charge. A front-end charge quoted as a percentage of the public offering price requires careful algebra: NAV equals offering price times 1 minus the charge rate, so offering price equals NAV divided by 1 minus that rate. The charge reduces the amount of a customer’s payment invested at NAV. Ongoing fund expenses are different costs and are reflected over time in fund performance. Read the prospectus for share-class terms rather than assuming every fund has the same charge. The related investment company and variable contracts guide offers further product context.

Worked example: Assume a fund has $102 million in assets, $2 million in liabilities, and 10 million shares. NAV is ($102 million − $2 million) ÷ 10 million = $10.00 per share. With a hypothetical 5% front-end charge measured against offering price, offering price is $10.00 ÷ 0.95 = $10.5263, or about $10.53. The roughly $0.53 difference is the charge per share at unrounded values.

Watch the distinction: Adding 5% to a $10 NAV gives $10.50, which is incorrect when the charge is 5% of offering price. Divide NAV by 0.95 instead.

Reference: [1]; [2]

31. Apply fund sales-charge reductions

A fund breakpoint reduces the front-end sales charge when an eligible purchase reaches a stated investment level. The first step is to read that fund family’s prospectus schedule and identify which accounts, holdings, and investors may be combined. Rights of accumulation can count eligible existing holdings with a new purchase when determining the applicable tier. A letter of intent instead states an intended investment amount over the fund’s specified period; it may give the lower charge immediately, subject to the fund’s terms if the commitment is not completed. Neither feature changes the fund’s investment risk or guarantees a return. For a recommendation, compare the customer’s actual available alternatives and total expenses. Avoid suggesting unnecessary purchases merely to cross a breakpoint: the dollars invested still face market risk and may be needed for other purposes.

Worked example: Suppose a hypothetical fund charges 4% below $50,000 and 3% from $50,000. A customer proposes a $45,000 purchase and has $10,000 in eligible holdings. Under the fund’s assumed rights-of-accumulation terms, $45,000 + $10,000 = $55,000 qualifies for the 3% tier. A 3% charge on $45,000 would be $1,350 if measured against that purchase amount, versus $1,800 at 4%, a $450 difference.

Watch the distinction: Existing holdings do not automatically qualify for every fund’s breakpoint. Verify the fund family’s eligibility and valuation rules before combining accounts or quoting a reduced charge.

Reference: [1]

32. Distinguish pooled vehicles

Pooled vehicles differ in how shares arise and how customers obtain a price. An open-end mutual fund issues or redeems shares through the fund at the next calculated NAV, adjusted for any applicable sales charge. A closed-end fund generally has a fixed share base after issuance and trades on an exchange at a market price that may be above or below NAV. An exchange-traded fund also trades intraday, while an authorized-participant creation and redemption process can help keep its market price near underlying value; the two can still differ. A unit investment trust holds a relatively fixed portfolio under its trust terms rather than an actively managed, changing portfolio. When selecting a vehicle, consider trading flexibility, market spread, expenses, portfolio management, and whether the price paid differs from reported NAV.

Worked example: A closed-end fund reports NAV of $20 per share but trades at $18. Its discount is ($20 − $18) ÷ $20 = 10% of NAV. Buying 100 shares at $18 costs $1,800 before charges, and that exchange price controls the trade. A mutual fund order placed before its pricing cutoff instead receives the next computed NAV, plus any applicable sales charge.

Watch the distinction: NAV is not always the price a customer pays for a pooled vehicle. Closed-end funds and ETFs trade at market prices, which can differ from their reported NAVs.

Reference: [1]; [2]

33. Value variable-annuity units

During a variable annuity’s accumulation phase, purchase payments allocated to a separate account buy accumulation units. Account value is the number of units times the current unit value, after considering how contract charges affect those figures. The unit value moves with investment performance, so the account value can rise or fall. A death-benefit or living-benefit rider may use a separate calculation base or guarantee with specific conditions, charges, and withdrawal effects. That base is not necessarily cash surrender value. To analyze a contract, trace the payment, units purchased, current unit value, contract charges, surrender terms, and rider language separately. If a customer needs accessible cash, a displayed benefit base should not be mistaken for an amount immediately withdrawable. Tax treatment also depends on whether the contract is held in a qualified or nonqualified arrangement.

Worked example: Assume a $10,000 payment buys 500 accumulation units at $20 per unit, with no charge deducted in this simplified purchase. Later, each unit is worth $24, so separate-account value is 500 × $24 = $12,000 before any further applicable charges. A rider statement might show a different benefit base under its formula; that figure cannot be treated as $12,000 of extra cash available for withdrawal.

Watch the distinction: A rider’s stated benefit base is not the same as separate-account value or surrender value. Its payout depends on the rider’s conditions and may change after withdrawals.

Reference: [1]; [2]

34. Interpret annuity payouts

Annuitization converts contract value into a stream of payments under a selected payout option. A variable annuity’s payment can change with separate-account performance relative to an assumed interest rate used in the payout calculation. Performance above the assumption generally raises later payments; performance below it generally lowers them, subject to contract mechanics. A life-only choice may offer a different starting payment from an option that continues payments to a beneficiary, because the insurer’s expected payment obligation differs. Keep investment movement separate from taxation. A qualified contract sits within a retirement arrangement whose distribution rules and tax character depend on that arrangement. A nonqualified contract is funded with after-tax money, so distributions can contain taxable earnings and a return of investment under applicable rules. Identify the contract type and payout election before describing taxable amounts.

Worked example: Suppose a variable annuity starts paying $500 monthly using a stated assumed interest rate. If its underlying investments outperform that assumption over the next measurement period, the next payment generally rises above $500; if they underperform, it generally falls below $500. The direction follows performance relative to the assumption, not merely whether returns were positive. The amount taxable from a payment requires separate analysis of the contract’s tax basis and status.

Watch the distinction: A positive investment return does not necessarily increase a variable payout. Returns must exceed the payout calculation’s assumed rate for the payment generally to rise.

Reference: [1]; [2]

35. Analyze REIT exposure

Real estate investment trusts provide different types of real-estate exposure. An equity REIT primarily owns properties and earns rent, making occupancy, lease renewals, property expenses, and asset values central. A mortgage REIT primarily holds or finances real-estate debt, so loan credit, funding costs, and interest-rate changes can dominate. A hybrid combines both sources. Leverage magnifies gains and losses in any structure and can strain distributions when borrowing costs rise or asset values weaken. REIT shares may trade at prices above or below estimated asset value, while a property portfolio can take time to sell. When comparing two REITs, identify the actual assets, liabilities, and sources of cash available for distributions rather than relying on the shared label. A high distribution rate does not establish that future payments are secure.

Worked example: An office equity REIT collects rent, while a mortgage REIT earns interest on property loans financed partly with borrowing. If office vacancy rises from a hypothetical 10% to 20%, fewer occupied units can pressure the equity REIT’s rent. If the mortgage REIT’s borrowing cost rises from 4% to 6% while its loan yield stays 7%, its simple funding spread narrows from 3 to 1 percentage point before other costs.

Watch the distinction: All REITs are not direct landlords. A mortgage REIT’s income and risks come mainly from real-estate debt and financing, so property vacancy may affect it through a different path.

Reference: [1]; [2]

36. Evaluate limited partnerships

A limited partnership separates management from passive ownership. The general partner manages the venture and carries obligations defined by the partnership structure; a limited partner generally contributes capital without running daily operations. Direct participation programs can pass taxable income, losses, and other tax items through to investors even when cash distributions differ. A tax loss is therefore not a cash payment, and its usefulness may be restricted by basis, amount at risk, passive activity, or other applicable limits. These investments can be hard to sell because a ready secondary market may be absent, and agreements may call for additional capital or otherwise affect obligations. Read the partnership terms for control, fees, borrowing, distribution priority, and capital commitments. Evaluate the underlying business on its own merits before treating possible tax benefits as a reason to invest.

Worked example: A partnership allocates a hypothetical $2,000 tax loss to a limited partner and distributes $0 cash. The investor has received no spending money; the $2,000 appears as a tax item. If only $1,200 is currently usable under the investor’s applicable limitations, the remaining $800 is not an immediate tax deduction. The exact treatment depends on the investor’s circumstances and partnership records.

Watch the distinction: A $2,000 allocated loss is not a $2,000 cash return or automatic tax saving. Its tax effect depends on the investor’s limits and applicable tax rate.

Reference: [1]; [2]

37. Calculate a long call

A call gives its buyer the right to buy the underlying shares at the strike price before or at expiration under the contract’s exercise terms. The buyer pays a premium and may let the option expire if exercise has no value. At expiration, intrinsic value per share is the greater of stock price minus strike or zero. Profit equals intrinsic value minus premium, multiplied by the contract’s share count, before transaction costs. Break-even is strike plus premium. A rising stock can produce a gain beyond the premium, while the buyer’s maximum option loss is the premium paid. Time value can make an option worth more than intrinsic value before expiration, so these expiration formulas should not be used as an exact interim sale price. The registered options principal guide covers a distinct supervisory qualification.

Worked example: One call covers 100 shares, has a $50 strike, and costs $4 per share, or $400. Expiration break-even is $50 + $4 = $54. If the stock closes at $58, intrinsic value is $58 − $50 = $8 per share, or $800. Profit is ($8 − $4) × 100 = $400 before costs. At $50 or below, the option expires without intrinsic value and the $400 premium is lost.

Watch the distinction: A call buyer does not need the stock to rise merely above the strike to earn an expiration profit. It must rise above strike plus premium.

Reference: [2]

38. Calculate a long put

A put gives its buyer the right to sell the underlying shares at the strike price under the contract’s exercise terms. At expiration, its intrinsic value per share is the greater of strike minus stock price or zero. Subtract the paid premium to find per-share profit, then multiply by the contract size. Break-even is strike minus premium. A put may protect stock already owned by setting an exercise price, or it may be purchased alone as a bearish position. Unlike a short stock sale, a stand-alone long put’s maximum loss is the premium paid. Its potential gain grows as the stock falls, but a stock cannot fall below zero. Before expiration, remaining time value can affect the option’s market price. For a hedge, include the stock’s purchase price and put premium when measuring the combined position.

Worked example: One put covers 100 shares, has a $60 strike, and costs $3 per share, or $300. Break-even is $60 − $3 = $57. If the stock finishes at $50, intrinsic value is $60 − $50 = $10 per share. Profit is ($10 − $3) × 100 = $700 before costs. At $60 or above, the put has no intrinsic value and the $300 premium is lost.

Watch the distinction: Buying a put is not the same cash-flow position as shorting shares. The put requires an upfront premium and caps the buyer’s option loss at that premium.

Reference: [2]

39. Assess a covered call

A covered call combines ownership of shares with a short call on those shares. The premium provides immediate income and reduces the stock position’s effective net cost, but the short call obligates the investor to deliver shares at the strike if assigned. Upside is therefore capped: above the strike, further stock gains go to the call holder. The maximum gain at expiration, assuming assignment and ignoring costs, is strike minus stock purchase price plus premium, times shares covered. Below the strike, the call may expire, leaving the investor with the stock and premium. The premium offers only a limited cushion against a large share-price decline. Assess whether the customer is willing to sell at the strike and whether dividend timing, taxes, and early assignment terms matter.

Worked example: A customer owns 100 shares bought at $48 and sells one $55 call for $2 per share, collecting $200. Effective net cost is $48 − $2 = $46 per share. If assigned at $55, stock gain is ($55 − $48) × 100 = $700; adding $200 premium gives $900 before costs. If the stock falls to $30, the combined loss at expiration is ($30 − $48 + $2) × 100 = −$1,600.

Watch the distinction: The word “covered” does not mean the stock is protected from a major decline. It means owned shares can satisfy the call delivery obligation.

Reference: [2]

40. Protect stock with a put

A protective put pairs owned stock with a purchased put. The investor keeps upside in the shares while gaining the right to sell them at the put’s strike. The put premium is the cost of this floor. At expiration, if the stock is below the strike, the combined position’s minimum sale value is the strike per share, assuming the put can be exercised as contracted. Maximum loss from a newly purchased stock position is stock cost minus strike plus put premium, times shares, before costs. Break-even on an upward move is stock cost plus premium. The floor applies for the option’s life; protection must be reassessed when it expires. If stock and put are acquired at different times, use the actual share basis and premium to calculate the customer’s result.

Worked example: A customer buys 100 shares at $50 and one $45 put for $2 per share. Total outlay is ($50 + $2) × 100 = $5,200, so upside break-even at expiration is $52. If the stock falls to $30, the customer can sell at $45 through the put, receiving $4,500. Loss is $5,200 − $4,500 = $700, the same as ($50 − $45 + $2) × 100.

Watch the distinction: The $45 put does not make $45 the position’s break-even price. The stock’s $50 cost and $2 premium make the protected maximum loss $7 per share.

Reference: [2]

41. Work a vertical spread

A vertical call spread combines calls on the same underlying security with the same expiration but different strike prices. Buying the lower strike call and selling the higher strike call creates a bull call spread. The premium received for the short call reduces the purchase cost, but it also caps the upside. First calculate the net debit per share: premium paid minus premium received. Multiply by the contract share count to find the maximum loss, which occurs when both calls expire worthless. Add the net debit per share to the lower strike for the expiration break-even price. The strike difference minus the net debit is the maximum gain per share. These figures describe the position at expiration; before then, option prices also reflect time value and changes in expected volatility.

Worked example: Buy one $50 call for $6 per share and sell one $55 call for $2 per share, with each contract covering 100 shares. The net debit is ($6 − $2) × 100 = $400. Break-even is $50 + $4 = $54. At or above $55, the spread is worth $5 × 100 = $500, so maximum profit is $100. Below $50, both calls expire worthless and the $400 debit is lost.

Watch the distinction: The $500 strike difference is the spread’s maximum expiration value, not its profit. Subtract the $400 paid to establish the position.

Reference: [1]

42. Interpret a long straddle

A long straddle buys a call and a put with the same strike and expiration. It expresses an expectation of a large price move without choosing its direction. The call gains intrinsic value as the stock rises above the strike; the put gains as it falls below. Add both premiums before judging whether either move is profitable. At expiration, the upper break-even equals the strike plus the combined premium, and the lower break-even equals the strike minus that premium. The maximum loss is the total premium if the stock finishes at the strike. Upside profit is theoretically unlimited, while downside profit is bounded because a stock cannot fall below zero. Before expiration, changes in expected volatility and time remaining can change the position’s value even if the stock price stays still. Options principal study material offers related strategy context.

Worked example: Buy a $50 call for $4 and a $50 put for $3, each covering 100 shares. Total cost is ($4 + $3) × 100 = $700. Expiration break-evens are $43 and $57. At a $60 stock price, the call is worth $10 per share and the put is worthless. Net profit is ($10 − $7) × 100 = $300, before transaction costs.

Watch the distinction: A straddle does not profit from every price change. The move must exceed the combined premiums at expiration before the position makes money.

Reference: [1]; [2]

43. Screen options activity

Options approval concerns the strategy the customer may use, not merely permission to trade any option. A covered call pairs a short call with shares available for delivery. An uncovered call lacks that stock position, so a rising share price can create a loss without a fixed ceiling. Assess the customer’s objectives, experience, financial resources and capacity to meet obligations, then compare those facts with the proposed strategy’s potential loss and liquidity demands. The options disclosure document explains general risks, but delivering it does not replace account review, the required agreements or supervisory approval for the relevant level of activity. Confirm who may give instructions and whether an order is solicited or unsolicited. The Series 7 content outline identifies options and customer profile analysis as part of the representative’s work.

Worked example: A customer approved for covered calls owns no shares of XYZ and asks to sell one XYZ call with a $50 strike for $3 per share. The $300 premium is the most the customer can receive initially. If XYZ reaches $80 at expiration, the call’s intrinsic value is $3,000 and the position loses $2,700 before costs. Covered-call approval does not authorize this uncovered sale; the account requires review for the requested strategy.

Watch the distinction: Calling the order unsolicited does not expand the account’s options approval. The representative must still verify authority and the firm’s approval for the strategy.

Reference: [1]; [2]

44. Apply the recommendation standard

For a recommendation to a retail customer, begin with the investment profile: objectives, finances, other holdings, risk tolerance, time horizon, liquidity needs and tax circumstances. Understand the security and its costs, then compare reasonably available alternatives that could meet the same need. A product’s suitability in isolation is insufficient if an available alternative offers materially better value for this customer. Fees matter because they reduce the return the customer keeps, especially over long holding periods. Consider differences in services, access, restrictions and expected holding period before choosing a share class. Identify conflicts, including compensation that favors one choice, and address applicable disclosure and care obligations. Document the customer-specific reasoning. A lower stated expense is an important fact, but an appropriate comparison uses total expected costs and relevant features rather than a single fee line.

Worked example: A customer investing $50,000 for ten years qualifies for two classes of the same fund. Assume identical portfolios and services, no sales charges, and annual expenses of 1.20% for Class A versus 0.70% for Class B. At an unchanged $50,000 balance, the difference is 0.50% × $50,000 = $250 a year, or $2,500 over ten years before compounding. Recommending A requires a concrete customer benefit that justifies that cost.

Watch the distinction: Disclosure of a higher fee does not, by itself, justify recommending the costlier class. The choice needs a defensible customer-specific reason.

Reference: [1]

45. Match risk to the time horizon

Risk tolerance describes how much fluctuation a customer is willing to endure. Risk capacity concerns the financial effect of a loss. A customer can be comfortable watching prices swing yet unable to replace money due for a fixed obligation. Separate assets by purpose and time horizon before selecting securities. For a near-term payment, ask when cash must be available, whether the amount is flexible and what other reliable resources exist. Then assess the remaining funds for longer-term goals, diversification and the customer’s willingness to accept losses. Liquidity also matters: a security can have an attractive expected return but be costly or difficult to sell when cash is needed. The recommendation should account for both the chance of a price decline and the consequence of having to sell at that point.

Worked example: A customer has $60,000 in an account and must pay $40,000 tuition in six months. Only $20,000 remains after reserving the tuition amount, assuming no other resources or account obligations. Even if the customer welcomes volatility, a 25% decline on the $40,000 would leave $30,000 and create a $10,000 tuition shortfall. Evaluate the $40,000 for timely access; assess the $20,000 separately for growth.

Watch the distinction: A stated aggressive objective does not establish that every dollar can bear loss. Match each planned withdrawal to its amount and timing.

Reference: [1]

46. Review replacements and repeated trades

A replacement decision compares what the customer gains with everything surrendered. For a fund or annuity switch, list immediate charges, ongoing expenses, surrender costs, taxes, lost guarantees and any waiting period for new benefits. Compare those costs with realistic improvements in diversification, service, investment fit or expected expense savings over the customer’s likely holding period. A simple recovery period divides an upfront cost by annual savings, but it ignores investment performance, changing balances and the time value of money. Repeated transactions deserve a separate review: frequent trading can generate charges and taxes without a corresponding customer benefit. Look at the full pattern, including who initiated trades, how long positions were held, turnover and cumulative costs. A favorable story for one trade does not excuse an unsuitable sequence of trades.

Worked example: A switch costs $600 now and is estimated to save $50 per year in fund expenses. Simple recovery takes $600 ÷ $50 = 12 years. If the customer plans to hold the investment for five years, estimated savings are only 5 × $50 = $250, leaving a $350 net cost before taxes, performance differences and other features. The expense saving alone does not support the proposed switch.

Watch the distinction: A lower annual expense does not automatically make a replacement economical. Include the entry cost, lost benefits and expected holding period.

Reference: [1]

47. Build a bond ladder

A bond ladder places principal in bonds with staggered maturities so scheduled repayments align with future cash needs. Start with the dates and amounts required, then choose maturities and credit exposures that can reasonably deliver cash near those dates. Coupons may provide additional income, but they should not be mistaken for repayment of principal. A ladder reduces reliance on selling one longer bond at an uncertain market price to fund an early withdrawal. It does not remove default risk or guarantee that matured proceeds can be reinvested at an attractive rate. Check issuer diversification, bond call provisions and the difference between stated maturity and possible early redemption. If the cash need is exact, allow for purchase prices, accrued interest and payment timing when sizing each rung.

Worked example: A customer needs $10,000 at the end of each of the next three years. Ignoring coupons, costs and credit events, placing $10,000 principal in bonds maturing in years one, two and three supplies $10,000 each year. Placing all $30,000 in a three-year bond supplies no scheduled principal in years one or two, so the customer might have to sell part of it at a market price that could be below purchase cost.

Watch the distinction: Three bonds with different coupons but the same maturity are not a maturity ladder. Stagger the principal repayment dates to match cash needs.

Reference: [1]

48. Calculate long margin equity

In a long margin account, equity is the current market value of securities minus the debit balance owed to the broker. The equity percentage is equity divided by current market value. A falling stock price reduces market value while the loan generally remains unchanged, so equity falls faster in percentage terms than it would in a fully paid account. Calculate the account figures first, then compare them with the applicable maintenance requirement; a decline alone does not establish that a call has occurred. Interest on the loan adds cost. If the customer sells securities or adds cash, recalculate both sides of the account rather than treating proceeds as free money. Margin increases purchasing power and also magnifies losses relative to the customer’s initial cash investment.

Worked example: A customer buys $20,000 of marginable stock using $10,000 cash and a $10,000 loan. Initial equity is $20,000 − $10,000 = $10,000, or 50% of market value. If the stock falls to $14,000 and the debit stays $10,000, equity is $4,000. The equity percentage is $4,000 ÷ $14,000 = 28.57%. Compare that figure with the applicable maintenance requirement before deciding whether action is required.

Watch the distinction: Do not subtract the customer’s original cash from current value. Margin equity uses the current market value and the outstanding debit balance.

Reference: [1]

49. Calculate short-account equity

A short seller borrows shares, sells them and remains obligated to return equivalent shares. The account’s credit balance reflects the sale proceeds plus the customer’s deposit; the short market value is the current cost of buying the shares back. Short-account equity equals credit balance minus short market value. When the stock rises, the repurchase obligation grows while the credit balance may stay the same, reducing equity. Calculate equity as a percentage of short market value, then compare it with the applicable maintenance requirement. A short position also involves borrowing costs, possible dividend obligations and the risk that shares become difficult to borrow. Because a stock price has no fixed ceiling, the potential price loss on an uncovered short sale has no fixed maximum.

Worked example: A customer shorts shares for $10,000 and deposits $5,000. Assuming no other transactions, the account credit is $15,000. If the shares now cost $12,000 to repurchase, equity is $15,000 − $12,000 = $3,000. Equity is $3,000 ÷ $12,000 = 25% of short market value. The $2,000 price increase has reduced equity by $2,000 before borrowing costs or other charges.

Watch the distinction: The $15,000 credit is not the customer’s profit. The account must still cover the current cost of replacing the borrowed shares.

Reference: [1]

50. Use the special memorandum account

The special memorandum account, or SMA, records certain margin-account credit capacity arising from excess equity and other eligible events. Begin with market value minus debit to find actual equity. Then compare equity with the applicable initial margin requirement to see whether there is excess equity that may support SMA credit. SMA is a bookkeeping measure of potential borrowing or purchasing capacity, not a separate cash investment or extra securities. Its available use can differ from the account’s current equity because later market declines do not necessarily erase a previously established SMA balance. A withdrawal or purchase still must satisfy current maintenance and other applicable restrictions. Do not infer that every dollar of excess equity can simply leave the account without checking the account’s resulting position.

Worked example: Suppose a long margin account has $30,000 market value and a $10,000 debit. Equity is $20,000. Under a hypothetical initial requirement of $15,000 for these holdings, excess equity is $20,000 − $15,000 = $5,000. That amount may establish SMA capacity under the stated assumptions. It does not raise market value to $35,000 or eliminate the $10,000 loan; any use must leave the account compliant.

Watch the distinction: SMA is not a second equity balance that can be added to account value. It records credit capacity subject to applicable limits.

Reference: [1]

51. Examine short-term instruments

Short-term instruments can serve cash management needs, but similar maturities do not create identical claims. A Treasury bill is a direct U.S. Treasury obligation generally sold at a discount and paid at face value at maturity. A bank certificate of deposit is a bank obligation with terms governing maturity, early access and any applicable deposit insurance. A money market fund holds a portfolio of short-term instruments; its shares are investment company securities, and their liquidity and risks depend on the fund. A repurchase agreement is a sale of securities coupled with an agreement to repurchase them, exposing the investor to counterparty and collateral arrangements. Compare issuer or counterparty, maturity, access to cash, price fluctuation and any fees before comparing quoted yields. A yield alone does not tell you what protects repayment.

Worked example: An instrument bought for $9,900 pays $10,000 at maturity. Its dollar gain is $10,000 − $9,900 = $100; the holding-period return is $100 ÷ $9,900 ≈ 1.01%, before fees. Without knowing the holding period, it cannot be converted reliably to an annual yield. Without knowing whether the instrument is a Treasury bill, bank deposit, fund share or repo, the gain also says nothing conclusive about liquidity or repayment risk.

Watch the distinction: A money market fund is not a bank deposit. Its short-term holdings and frequent liquidity do not give it the same legal claim.

Reference: [1]; [2]

52. Transfer customer assets

An in-kind transfer moves eligible securities from one account to another without selling them. The customer keeps the same number of shares and remains exposed to their market price during the process. Verify that the account registrations and ownership details match, identify assets the receiving firm can hold, and note positions that may require special handling. Proprietary funds, certain limited products, unsettled trades or restricted securities can delay or complicate a transfer. Liquidating a position is a separate decision that may create costs and tax consequences, so obtain clear instructions where a sale is needed. Track the transfer record, residual cash or later distributions, and the cost-basis information that should follow the position. A transfer request is complete only when the expected assets and records reconcile.

Worked example: A customer transfers 100 shares valued at $50 each to another broker in kind. The position is worth $5,000 at that moment, but no $5,000 sale proceeds are created; the receiving account should hold 100 shares, subject to price movement. If the old account also contains a proprietary fund the new broker cannot hold, the customer needs a separate plan for that asset before assuming the entire account will arrive intact.

Watch the distinction: Do not record an in-kind move as a sale at the transfer-date value. Ownership changes custody location while the share position continues.

Reference: [1]

53. Process corporate actions

Corporate actions change an investor’s position or entitlements according to an issuer’s terms. For a stock split, multiply the share count by the split ratio and divide the per-share price by that ratio to check the approximate unchanged total value, ignoring market movement. A cash dividend follows a different sequence: the issuer declares terms, determines which holders are entitled under the relevant dates, and pays cash that must be credited to the proper accounts. Voluntary actions, such as a tender offer, require the customer’s election within the applicable process; the representative should communicate the terms and deadline without choosing for the customer absent authority. Reconcile notices, elections, resulting shares or cash, and account records. Corporate actions can also affect cost basis, so distinguish economic value from tax records.

Worked example: A customer owns 150 shares at $40, worth 150 × $40 = $6,000. After a 2-for-1 split, the account should show 300 shares at about $20 each, still worth $6,000 before market movement. A $1 cash dividend on 150 shares instead creates a $150 payment for an entitled holder; it does not double the share count. The two events require different position and cash entries.

Watch the distinction: More shares after a split do not, by themselves, make the investor richer. Check the adjusted price and total position value.

Reference: [1]

Function 4: Obtains and Verifies Customers’ Purchase and Sales Instructions and Agreements; Processes, Completes, and Confirms Transactions

54. Confirm the customer’s order

Before entering an order, translate the customer’s instruction into an unambiguous trade. Identify the security, buy or sell side, quantity, account and any price or time conditions. Verify that the person giving the instruction has authority for that account and that the security is available for delivery if selling. If the customer uses a relative phrase such as “half my shares,” confirm its reference point and how to handle a fraction of a share. Multiple accounts, lots or securities with similar names make assumptions especially risky. An order ticket and later confirmation should reflect what the customer actually authorized, including any changes. When material details are missing, obtain them before entry; an apparent interpretation can create an unauthorized trade or a delivery problem.

Worked example: A customer says, “Sell half my shares,” but has 175 shares in one account and 50 in another. Half of the first position is 87.5 shares; half of the second is 25; half of both combined is 112.5. Those are different instructions, and fractional-share handling may differ. Confirm which account and the exact share quantity before placing a sell order.

Watch the distinction: A representative cannot select the most convenient account or round the quantity silently. The customer must resolve the material ambiguity.

Reference: [1]; [2]

55. Choose an order type

Order type determines which outcome the customer controls. A market order seeks prompt execution but does not set a maximum purchase price or minimum sale price. A buy limit specifies the highest acceptable execution price; a sell limit specifies the lowest. Execution is uncertain if the market never reaches the limit or if available shares are insufficient. A stop order activates when its trigger is reached and ordinarily becomes a market order, so the eventual execution price can differ from the stop price, especially in a fast market. A stop-limit order adds a price boundary after activation but can remain unfilled. Ask whether the customer values speed, price control or protection against a move, then verify the chosen order’s side and trigger direction. Series 7 practice questions can reinforce these distinctions.

Worked example: A customer will buy only at $25 or less while the displayed ask is $26. A buy limit at $25 respects that maximum but may never fill. A buy stop at $25 would generally trigger immediately when the market is already above $25, becoming a market order that could execute above the desired price. If the customer requires both a trigger and a price ceiling, a stop-limit has different execution risk.

Watch the distinction: A stop price is a trigger, not a guaranteed execution price. Use a limit when the customer sets a strict purchase ceiling.

Reference: [1]; [2]

56. Read the quote and execution

A quoted bid is the price at which a buyer is willing to purchase; the ask is the price at which a seller offers to sell. A customer seeking immediate execution normally buys against the ask and sells against the bid, subject to available size and changing quotes. The ask minus bid is the quoted spread per share. It helps describe transaction cost and liquidity, but it is not automatically the executing broker’s profit. In an agency trade, the firm acts as an intermediary and may charge a commission. In a principal trade, the firm trades from its own account and its compensation may appear through a markup or markdown. Read the trade confirmation for capacity, execution price and charges rather than inferring them from the displayed quote alone.

Worked example: Suppose the displayed market is $20.10 bid and $20.20 ask, with enough shares at each price. Buying 100 shares at the ask costs 100 × $20.20 = $2,020 before charges. Selling 100 at the bid brings 100 × $20.10 = $2,010 before charges. The difference is $0.10 per share, or $10 for 100 shares. It is a quoted spread, not proof of the firm’s earnings.

Watch the distinction: Do not use the bid to estimate an immediate customer purchase. A buyer normally pays the ask, subject to execution conditions.

Reference: [1]; [2]

57. Handle a short sale

A short sale begins with borrowed shares sold into the market. The seller then owes equivalent shares to the lender, so closing the position requires buying shares back. Mark the order correctly as short and complete the applicable locate process before execution; a customer’s willingness to bear risk does not substitute for the borrowing arrangement. The price result equals sale proceeds minus repurchase cost, before commissions, borrow charges and payments owed on the borrowed shares. A falling stock price benefits the short seller, while a rising price creates a loss with no fixed upper bound. The account’s margin and available borrow must be monitored while the position remains open. Distinguish a short sale from selling shares the customer already owns and can deliver.

Worked example: A customer shorts 100 shares at $40, receiving $4,000 in sale proceeds that remain subject to account requirements. Later, buying 100 shares at $47 costs $4,700. The price loss is $4,700 − $4,000 = $700, before fees and borrowing costs. The order must be marked short, and the required locate process must be satisfied before the initial sale; the later purchase closes the share obligation.

Watch the distinction: Short-sale proceeds are not free cash profit. The customer still owes shares and can lose more as the repurchase price rises.

Reference: [1]; [2]

58. Follow settlement and delivery

Trade date records when buyer and seller agree to a transaction; settlement is when the required cash and securities are delivered through the clearing process. A confirmation records the trade terms, but its arrival does not prove that delivery has occurred. For a sale, check that the account holds deliverable shares or that any shares elsewhere can arrive in time. For a purchase, confirm the customer can meet the payment obligation. Restrictions, unsettled positions or mismatched registration may complicate delivery. When a shortfall appears, identify its size, source and expected resolution promptly, then follow the firm’s operations and supervisory process. Avoid assuming that a later transfer will succeed merely because the customer says the asset exists at another custodian.

Worked example: A customer sells 200 shares, but the account has only 150 available for delivery; the other 50 remain with another custodian. The immediate shortfall is 200 − 150 = 50 shares. Confirm whether those 50 can be transferred and delivered as required, and escalate the delivery issue promptly. The trade confirmation may correctly show a 200-share sale while the delivery obligation remains unresolved.

Watch the distinction: A correct confirmation does not cure a missing security position. Reconcile the executed quantity with shares actually available for settlement.

Reference: [1]; [2]

59. Check the trade confirmation

A trade confirmation should be checked against both the customer’s instruction and the execution record. Compare the security identifier, account, buy or sell side, share quantity, execution price, trade capacity and itemized charges. A limit order is particularly sensitive to a price discrepancy because the customer set a boundary. First determine whether the displayed figure is truly the execution price or a total that includes a separately disclosed charge; then inspect the order and execution records. If the confirmed execution breached the limit, escalate the issue for investigation and correction under the firm’s procedures. Do not silently alter records or dismiss the discrepancy because its dollar value is small. Accurate records and timely customer communication matter independently of the immediate financial difference.

Worked example: A customer authorizes buying 100 shares at a $30 limit. The confirmation lists an execution price of $30.20, excluding charges. The confirmed principal amount is $3,020 rather than the $3,000 maximum implied by 100 × $30, a $20 difference. Compare the original order, routing and execution records, then escalate the apparent limit breach. A separate commission would need to be analyzed separately from the execution price.

Watch the distinction: A small dollar discrepancy is still a discrepancy. Check whether the price breached the order before treating the confirmation as settled fact.

Reference: [1]; [2]

60. Resolve a trade discrepancy

Resolve a suspected trade error by preserving the sequence of facts: customer instruction, order entry, any modification, execution, allocation and confirmation. Compare quantities, prices, accounts and timestamps to locate where the divergence began. Notify the appropriate supervisor and operations staff promptly so the firm can determine the correction and customer communication required. An execution for the wrong quantity remains a real trade; rewriting the original order record to match the intended quantity would hide what happened. Any additional trade must have proper customer authority and be handled under the firm’s error process, with market risk and customer treatment considered. Record both the original event and the remedy accurately. The representative should not promise that the market will still offer the original price.

Worked example: The customer instructs a purchase of 200 shares, but the representative enters 20 and only 20 execute. The shortfall is 200 − 20 = 180 shares. The order and execution records must continue to show 20, while the customer instruction shows 200. Escalate the error, confirm the authority and process for any additional 180-share purchase, and communicate the outcome without presenting the later trade as part of the original execution.

Watch the distinction: Changing the order ticket from 20 to 200 after execution would erase the evidence needed to explain and correct the error.

Reference: [1]; [2]

Official references and further reading

  1. Existing article reference
  2. Series 7 – General Securities Representative Exam | FINRA.org
All study guides

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Practical answers to help you apply the guidance for FINRA General Securities Representative Exam (Series 7).

How should a representative compare two investments with different risks?
Start with the customer’s objective, time horizon, liquidity needs, financial capacity and existing holdings. Then compare each investment’s expected source of return, possible loss, costs, tax effects and effect on portfolio concentration. A higher quoted yield alone does not settle the choice: it may compensate for credit risk, a call feature, less liquidity or principal repayment that can change over time.
Why can a bondholder lose money when the issuer keeps paying interest?
A bond’s market price changes as prevailing yields change. A bond paying $50 annually on $1,000 face value has a 5% coupon. If comparable new bonds offer more than 5%, buyers will generally pay less than $1,000 for it. A sale before maturity can therefore produce a capital loss even if every scheduled coupon has been paid. Credit quality, calls and liquidity can also affect its price.
What is the difference between a recommendation and an unsolicited order?
A recommendation is the representative’s suggestion that a customer buy, sell, hold or follow an investment strategy, so the applicable recommendation standard and the customer’s investment profile matter. An unsolicited order originates with the customer. The representative must still verify the instruction, follow trading requirements and record it accurately; calling a suggested trade unsolicited does not change who initiated it.

Keep Reading

Related Study Guides

Explore related guides and preparation topics.